历史网-中国历史之家、历史上的今天、历史朝代顺序表、历史人物故事、看历史、新都网、历史春秋网移动版

首页 > 中国史 > 中国古代史 >

全球史及其多元潜力(4)

⑦参见Bruce Cumings, “Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies during and after the Cold War,” in Christopher Simpson, ed., Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences during the Cold War, New York: New Press, 1998, pp. 159-188.
    ⑧参见Thomas Bender, “Politics, Intellect, and the American University, 1945-1995,” Daedalus, vol 1261, 1997, pp. 1-38.
    ⑨参见John Higham, History: Professional Scholarship in America, 2[nd] ed., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
    ⑩参见Robert B. Townsend, “The Status of Women and Minorities in the History Profession, 2008,” Perspectives on History, vol. 46, no. 6(September 2008)。
    (11)参见Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
    (12)Victoria E. Bonnelli and Lynn Hunt, eds., Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture, Berkely: University of California Press, 1999.
    (13)参见一部非常有影响力的作品,Howard Zinn, A People‘s History of the United States: 1942-Present, New York: Harper Collins, 1980.
    (14)Michael N. Bastedo, “Curriculum in Higher Education: The Historical Roots of Contemporary Issues,” in Philip G. Altbach, Patricia J. Gumport and Robert O. Berdahl, eds., American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005, pp. 462-485.
    (15)例如,关于这个课题有一个批判性的叙述。Francois Cusset, French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
    (16)参见Dominic Sachsenmaier, Global Perspectives on Global History: Theories and Approaches in a Connected World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, Chapter 2.
    (17)参见Dominic Sachsenmaier, Global Perspectives on Global History: Theories and Approaches in a Connected World.
    (18)参见Dominic Sachsenmaier, Global Perspectives on Global History: Theories and Approaches in a Connected World.
    (19)例如,Dirk van Laak, ber alles in der Welt: Deutscher Imperialismus im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, München: C. H. Beck, 2005.
    (20)例如,Birthe Kundrus, Moderne Imperialisten: Das Kaiserreich im Spiegel seiner Kolonien, Kln: Bhlau, 2003. 总体而言,该研究借鉴了汉娜·阿伦特《极权主义的起源》一书的框架,该书明显的特点是跨越国家范围。但是,当前的历史研究很大程度上是基于一手材料的分析。
    (21)例如,Sebastian Conrad, Globalisierung und Nation im Deutschen Kaiserreich, München: C. H. Beck, 2006.
    (22)其中一例是“Global History-The World, 1000-2000”系列研究,其中8卷是对过去一千年全球历史的记述。
    (23)Jürgen Osterhammel, Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19, Jahrhunderts, München: C. H. Beck, 2009. 英文版即将由普林斯顿大学出版社出版。
    德国雅各布斯大学历史系及亚太研究所教授
    
    

(责任编辑:admin)