|
Abstract: This article discusses how Turkish Muslim leaders perceive and respond to host-state policies engineered to incorporate Islam into France and German societies. It shows that the Turkish Islamic umbrella organizations are more critical of host-state policies in Germany than in France. More specifically, for leaders in both France and Germany, the French council for the Muslim Faith is regarded as a more legitimate and effective institution compared with the its counterpart, the German Islam Conference. Even though in France the constitution demands a strict separation of church and state, in reality, rules are relaxed in a way to provide benefits to Islamic organizations. In contrast, while the constitution is more accommodating in Germany, this flexibility has not led to favorable relations with Islamic organizations. Based on interviews conducted with organization leaders and policy-makers, this article delves into the gap between the legal rights reserved for Muslim organizations and their implementation in practice. 摘要：本文讨论了土耳其穆斯林领导人如何看待和回应东道国将伊斯兰教纳入法国和德国社会的政策设计。它显示：土耳其伊斯兰保护伞组织指责东道国的政策方面，德国比在法国更多受到批评。具体而言，对在法国和德国的领导人，穆斯林信仰法国理事会，相比德国伊斯兰会议，被认为是一个更合法和有效的机构。即使在法国，宪法要求教会和国家之间的一个严格的分离，在现实中，规则被放宽以有利于伊斯兰组织。相比之下，虽然在德国宪法更为包容，这种灵活性并没有带来与伊斯兰组织的良好关系。基于对组织的领导人和决策者进行的访谈，本文深入探讨了保留给穆斯林组织的法律权利与其在实践中实施的差距。 作者：Z. Ayca Arkilic 来源：Journal of Muslim Minorities Affairs, 2015, Volume 35, No. 1 (责任编辑：admin) |