|
Abstract: The paper examines racism's debatability' by looking at the interpellation of public acts of racism. The idea of racism as an event appears crucial to the judgment of its legitimacy. By examining racism as a disjointed series of public events that are often accompanied by elisions of the connections between racist eruptions' and systemic conditions, I shine light on what is meant by racism today. Racism can be theorized dually as both frozen and motile. This is due to emphasis being placed on what race is taken to be, rather than on what it does. Confusion over how to formulate anti-racism is based on this misconception of race at the core of much anti-racist thought, leading to an obscuration of racism. Critically examining some contemporary anti-racist activity, I briefly assess the role played by those who challenge racism in legitimizing or negating official interpretations of racism in contemporary Australia. 摘要：通过对公开的种族主义行为质询的考察，本文研究了种族主义的可辩论性。作为一个事件出现的种族主义观念似乎是判断其合法性的关键依据。通过检查作为一系列不相关的公共事件中的种族主义，这些种族主义经常缺乏种族主义者爆发的条件和系统性的条件之间的关联，我指出了种族主义在今天意味着什么。理论上，种族主义可以是冻结的也可以是活动的。这取决于强调什么种族，而不是强调它做什么。如何建构反种族主义的困惑是基于这种对种族的误解处于很多反种族主义思想的核心地位，它导致了对种族主义的蒙昧。我仔细严谨地研究过一些当代的反种族主义活动，简要评估了那些以认可或否定当代澳大利亚官方对种族主义的解释来挑战种族主义的活动者所扮演的角色。 作者: Lentin, Alana 来源：ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES 卷: 39 期: 1 特刊: SI 页: 33-48 出版年: JAN 2 2016 (责任编辑：admin) |