|
Abstract: Tolerance has an ambiguous role in anti-racism strategies. On the one hand, it is a clear antidote to racial intolerance. Yet on the other, not only is it not the only antidote to racial intolerance (respect for difference and indifference to difference are also possibilities), but the fact that it involves a negative attitude or belief and the power to act on it suggests it is far from ideal. These problems are compounded by the fact that racial tolerance can only deal with racial intolerance, which because of its intentionality seems to be only a small part of racism. In this paper, I defend racial tolerance by arguing that conceptually it does have a role in anti-racism strategies and normatively describes an important minimum for those at risk of committing acts of racial intolerance. 摘要：包容在反种族主义策略中具有一个模糊的角色。一方面，它是种族不包容的确定的对抗手段。然而另一方面，它不但不是种族不包容的唯一的矫正方法 (尊重差异和包容差异也是可能的矫正方法)，而且事实上，它包含一种消极的态度或信仰以及行为的动力，因此它是很不理想的。这些问题由于种族包容只能处理种族不包容的事实而被复杂化了，因其目标似乎仅仅是种族主义的一小部分。在本文中，我捍卫种族包容理论，认为在概念上它在反种族主义策略中确有作用，并且规范地描述了其有引发种族不包容行为危险的重要的、最少的那部分。 作者：Peter Balint 来源：Ethnic and Racial Studies, Volume 39, Issue 1, 2016, Special Issue: Reconfiguring anti-racism (责任编辑：admin) |