|
Construction and reification in nation building: The case of Yugoslavia fully explained? 国家建构中的和创建和物化：南斯拉夫的案例被充分解释了吗？ Abstract: The study of nations and ethnicities has been subject to recent trends, particularly, those denying substance to ethnicity and nation, but focusing on the way ethnicity and nation are socially constructed and reified' (constructivism-reificationism). In this article, this idea is tested on the Yugoslav case, where cases of reification are said to have been arbitrary'. Such a position suggests that members of the Yugoslav federation went on their own ways because of reification' in the form of the republics and provinces. Although it is found that the republics and one province did enhance the process of national constitution, and although ethnic entrepreneurs' were active in the 1980sa fact that is in line with a constructivist-reificationist theoretical position there is one distinctive case that directly challenges such a position: Vojvodina did not opt for independence but, because of its Serb majority, it swiftly became integrated into Serbia. Moreover, the current article presents additional information to suggest that, although constructionist-reificationist approaches are relevant, they do not suffice to explain nation'. 摘要：有关国家和民族的研究一直都是最近的研究趋势，特别是那些否定种族和民族的物化，但关注种族和民族的社会建构和物化的方式（建构主义-物化主义）的研究。在这篇文章中，用这个想法测试了南斯拉夫的案例，案例的物化被认为是任意的。这样的立场表明，因为物化是基于共和国和省的形式进行的，南斯拉夫联盟各成员继续按照自己的方式运作。虽然共和国和一个省的形式并没有加强国家建构的过程，并且尽管民族企业家们在八十年代是活跃的 （与建构主义者-物化主义者的理论立场是一致的），但有一个独特的案例直接挑战这样一个立场：伏伊伏丁那（Vojvodina）没有选择独立，反而，由于塞族占多数，它迅速融入塞尔维亚。此外，本文提出更多的信息表明，尽管建构主义者-物主义者的方法是相关的，它们不足以解释国家的建构。 作者: Flere, Sergej; Klanjsek, Rudi 来源：ETHNICITIES 卷: 16 期: 6 页: 842-868 出版年: DEC 2016 (责任编辑：admin) |