|
注释： ①Marjorie McCallum Chibnall,"Eileen Edna Le Poer Power(1889-1940)",in Jane Chance,ed.,Women Medievalists and the Academy,Madison:The University of Wisconsin Press,2005,p.312. ②Maxine L.Berg,"Eileen Power and Women's History",Gender and History,Vol.6,No.2,1994,p.269. ③实际上，艾琳·鲍尔在1920年就出版了她的第一部著作《科格索尔的佩考克家族》(Th Paycockes of Coggesball)，该书只有66页。但是克拉潘认为，该书是艾琳未来研究的一个注脚，包含她未来研究的所有因素：有爱、对过去历史的人文关注、对羊毛历史的特殊关注。J.H.Clapham,"Eileen Power,1889-1940",Economica,Vol.7,No.28,1940,p.353. ④该书700多页，涉及内容广泛，英国大部分教团的修女院都有涉及，其中谈到了英国修女院的经济状况(作为雇佣者和消费者)、修女的教育情况及作为教育机构的情况，既涉及修女又涉及与修院相关的其他各色人等的生活状况(公共生活与私生活)。 ⑤Eileen Power,Medieval English Nunneries,c.1275 to 1535,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1922,pp.3-4. ⑥M.M.波斯坦是英国著名的中世纪经济史学家，在伦敦经济学院时，他曾长期担任艾琳·鲍尔的助手，后来成为她的丈夫。20世纪30年代，艾琳·鲍尔婉拒剑桥大学的教职邀请，继续留在伦敦经济学院工作，同时推荐波斯坦担任剑桥大学的经济史教授。艾琳后期的学术研究受波斯坦影响很大。 ⑦Eileen Power,"The Position of Women in the Middle Ages",in C.G.Crump and E.F.Jacob,eds.,The Legacy of the Middle Ages,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1938.这篇文章具有很大的影响，但艾琳并不认为这部作品代表她的观点，而是满足该卷编者做出妥协的产物。参见Judith M.Bennett,"Medieval Women in Modern Perspective",in Bonnie Smith,ed.,Women's History in Global Perspective,Vol.2,Urbana:University of Illinois Press,2005,p.141。 ⑧J.H.Clapham,"Eileen Power,1889-1940",Economica,Vol.7,No.28,1940,p.354. ⑨G.G.Coulton,Five Centuries of Religion,Vol.1,Cambridge:Eng.University Press,1923,pp.138-197. ⑩Alexander Hamilton Thompson,"The Monastic Orders",in J.B.Bury planned,J.R.Tanner,C.W.Previtéorton,Z.N.Brooke,eds.,The Cambridge Medieval History,Vol.5,Contest of Empire and Papacy,Cambridge:Eng.University Press,1926,pp.658-696. (11)Rowena E.Archer,"Review A Woman in History:Eileen Power,1889-1940 by Maxine L.Berg",The English Historical Review,Vol.113,No.453.Sep.,1998,p.1027. (12)David Bell,"What Nuns Read:the State of the Question",in James C.Clark,ed.,The Culture of Medieval English Monasticism,Woodbridge:The Boydell Press,2007,p.113. (13)Judith M.Bennett,"Medieval Women in Modem Perspective",in Bonnie Smith,ed.,Women's History in Global Perspective,Vol.2,pp.141-142. (14)Maxine L.Berg,A Woman in History:Eileen Power,1889-1940,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996,pp.117-118. (15)J.H.Clapham,"Eileen Power,1889-1940",Economica,Vol.7,No.28,1940,pp.354,352. (16)David Bell,"What Nuns Read:the State of the Question",in James C.Clark,ed.,The Culture of Medieval English Monasticism,p.113. (17)转引自Maxine L.Berg,A Woman in History:Eileen Power,1889-1940,pp.122-123。 (18)Maxine L.Berg,A Woman in History:Eileen Power,1889-1940,p.87. (19)转引自Ellen Jacobs,"Eileen Power's Asian Journey 1920-1921:History,Narrative,and Subjectivity",Women's History Review,Vol.7,No.3,1998,p.303。 (20)Maxine L.Berg,A Woman in History:Eileen Power,1889-1940,p.87. (21)Maxine L.Berg,"The First Women Economic Historians",Economic History Review,Vol.45,No.2,1992,p.318. (22)Marjorie McCallum Chibnall,"Eileen Edna Le Poer Power(1889-1940)",in Jane Chance,ed.,Women Medievalists and the Academy,p.317. (23)玛丽亚·露西娅帕拉蕾丝－伯克编：《新史学：自由与对话》，彭刚译，北京大学出版社2007年版，第37页。 (24)T.C.Barker,"The Beginnings of the Economic Historical Society",The Economic History Review,Vol.30,No.1,1977,pp.12-14. (25)J.H.Clapham,"Eileen Power,1889-1940",Economica,Vol.7,No.28,1940,p.356. (26)Eileen Power,"On Medieval History as a Social Study",Economica,new series,Vol.1,No.1,1934,pp.13-29. (27)Eileen Power & R.H.Tawney,eds.,Tudor Economic Documents:Being Select Documents Illustrating the Economic and Social History of Tudor England,London:Longmans,Green and Co.,1924. (28)R.H.Tawney,"Eileen Power",Economic History Review,10(1940),pp.91-94.转引自Maxine L.Berg,A Woman in History:Eileen Power,1889-1940,p.149,note 35。 (29)Eileen Power,The Wool Trade in English Medieval History:Being the Ford Lectures,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1941. (30)Adrian R.Bell,The English Wool Market 1230-1327,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007. (31)Eileen Power,M.M.Postan,Studies in English Trade in 15th Century,London:Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.,1933. (32)J.H.Clapham,"Eileen Power,1889-1940",Economica,Vol.7,No.28,1940,p.357. (33)J.H.Clapham,Eileen Power,eds.,Cambridge Economic History of Europe,Vol.1,The Agrarian Life of the Middle Ages,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1942.该丛书需要特别赘述几句。众所周知，20世纪初的经济社会史研究以法国的年鉴学派最为有名。但他们有很强的民族情感，排除日耳曼因素。而鲍尔等英国学者的经济社会史研究更重视日耳曼因素。该从书则是英国在这方面探索性的第一个成果。跨度从中世纪早期一直到19世纪俄国的农奴制，涵盖了影响欧洲的一些大的运动——定居、殖民、农业技术、庄园的兴起等。 (34)这是艾琳·鲍尔对自己的称呼，参见Maxine L.Berg,"Eileen Power and Women's History",Gender and History,Vol.6,No.2,1994,p.268。 (35)Maxine L.Berg,"Foreword",in Eileen Power,Medieval Women,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997,p.xvii. (36)克拉潘在为艾琳写的纪念文章中也提到，艾琳“憎恨”大学中存在的两性不平等现象，不能忍受在女子学院教书，参见J.H.Clapham,"Eileen Power,1889-1940",Economica,Vol.7,No.28,1940,p.352。 (37)1923年，剑桥大学才授予女生正式的大学学位，但直到1948年妇女才可以在大学获得全职教职。 (38)J.H.Clapham,"Eileen Power,1889-1940",Economica,Vol.7,No.28,1940,p.356. (39)Maxine L.Berg,A Woman in History:Eileen Power,1889-1940,p.12. (40)T.C.Barker,"The Beginnings of the Economic Historical Society",Economic History Review,Vol.30,No.1,1977,pp.1-19. (41)Maxine L Berg,A Woman in History:Eileen Power,1889-1940,p.262. (42)Judith M.Bennett,"Medievalism and Feminism",Speculum,Vol.68,No.2,1993,p.313. （原文刊于《史学理论研究》2014年第4期） (责任编辑：admin) |