从政治观念史到政治语言史(10)
http://www.newdu.com 2024/11/24 05:11:00 《国际社会科学杂志：中 埃利亚斯·何塞·帕 参加讨论
注释： ①见《“概念史”和“社会史”》(Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte)一文中对科塞勒克的讨论。原文收入W.Sellinand and V.Schieder(eds.),Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland,Gttingen:Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht,1986,p.102. ②需要指出的是，斯金纳和波考克都未使用“剑桥学派”这个术语。其他学者常将以下诸人归于该学派名下：John Dunn,Stefan Collini,Anthony Pagden,Richard Tuck,James Tully,Donald Winch。关于该学派与德国概念史学派的异同，见Melvin Richter,"Reconstructing the History of Political Languages:Pocock,Skinner,and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe," History and Theory,vol.29,no.1,1990,pp.38-70; Kari Palonen,Die Entzauberung der Begriffe:Das Umschreiben der politischen Begriffe bei Quentin Skinner uud Reinhart Koselleck,Münster:LIT-Verlag,2004. ③参见K.R.Massingham,"Skinner Is as Skinner Does," Politics,vol.16,1981,p.128,quoted from Kari Palonen,Quentin Skinner:History,Politics,Rhetoric,Cambridge and Malden,MA:Polity Press,2003. ④对语境的系统考察是欧洲中世纪修辞学的一大成就。借由对西塞罗等古典作家的分类研究，中世纪学者通过quis(何人)、quid(何事)、cur(何因)、ubi(何处)、quando(何时)、quemadmodum(如何)、quibusadminiculs(何种方式)等设问来细致分析特定话语中的语境因素。 ⑤当然，将政治语言的客观实体性作为区分其与政治观念的关键点，并不必然意味着对认识论上的实在论学说的肯定。这里，笔者意在反驳一种传统偏见，即认为概念史仅仅研究某种思想上的存在，而由社会史或政治史负责对物质实体的研究。 参考文献： [1]AUSTIN,J.L.1962.How to Do Things with Words,Oxford:Clarendon Press. [2]BALL,Terence.2002."Confessions of a Conceptual Historian," Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought vol.6. [3]BLUMENBERG,Hans.1999.Die Legitimitt der Neuzeit:Erneuerte Ausgsbe,Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp. [4]BLUMENBERG,Hans.1998.Paradigmen zu Einer Metaphorolagie,Frankfurt:Suhrkamp. [5]BRUNNER,Otto.1980.Neue Wege der Verfassungs-und Sozialgeschichte,Gttingen:Vandeuboeck & Ruprecht. [6]KOSELLECK,Reinhart.1993.Futures Past:On the Semantics of Historical Times,Cambridge,Polity Press. [7]MASSINGHAM,K.R.2003."Skinner Is as Skinner Does," Politics,vol.16,1981,p.128,quoted from Kari Palonen,Quentin Skinner,History,Politics,Rhetoric,Cambridge and Malden,MA:Polity Press. [8]PALONEN,Kari.2004.Die Entzauberung der Begriffe:Das Umschreiben der politischen Begriffe bei Quentin Skinner und Reinhart Koselleck,Münster:LIT-Verlag. [9]PALTI,Elías José."The 'Return of the Subject' as a Historico-Intellectual Problem," History and Theory,vol.43,2004,pp.57-82. [10]PALTI,Elías José.2014."The 'Theoretical Revolution' in Intellectual History:From the History of Political Ideas to the History of Political Languages," History and Theory,vol.53(October),pp.387-405. [11]POCOCK,John G.A.1991.Virtue,Commerce,and History,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [12]RICHTER,Melvin.1990."Reconstructing the History of Political Languages:Pocock,Skinner,and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe," History and Theory,vol.29,no.1,pp.38-70. [13]ROSANVALLON,Pierre.2003.Pour une historie conceptuelle du polítique,Paris:Seuil. [14]SELLINAND,W.and SCHIEDER,V.1986.Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland,Gttingen:Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht,1986. (责任编辑：admin) |
- 上一篇：哲学诠释学的效果历史观及其在中西史学比较中的价值
- 下一篇：不确定性与思想的历史