|
[21][英国]夏普著，吕大吉、何光沪、徐大建译：《比较宗教史》，第291页。按：“范德流”，中译本为“范·德·莱乌”。 [22]Pettersson and kerberg. Interpreting Religious Phenomena: Studies with Reference to the Phenomenology of Religion, Humanities Press, 1981, p. 13. [23]Van Der Leeuw. Religion in Essence and Manifestation, translated by J. E. Turner, Gloucester: Peter Smith, 1967, p. 646n. [24]ibid., p. 675. [25]Eliade. The Quest: History and Meaning in Religion, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969, p. 35. [26]Hans H. Penner. Impasse and Resolution: A Critique of the Study of Religion, New York: Peter Lang, 1989, p. 61 note 6. [27]George James. Interpreting Religion: The Phenomenological Approaches of Pierre Dani l Chantepie de la Saussaye, W. Brede Kristensen, and Gerardus van der Leeuw, Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 1995, p. 231. [28]Hadin. Phenomenology and the Making of the World, Stockholm: Uppsala, 1997, pp. 73-98. [29]C. Jouco Bleeker. The Sacred Bridge: Researches into the Nature and Structure of Religion, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1963, p. 3. [30][意大利]达瓦马尼著，高秉江译：《宗教现象学》，北京：人民出版社，2006年，第16-17页。 [31][意大利]达瓦马尼著，高秉江译：《宗教现象学》，第25页注释③。 [32]Bleeker. The Contribution of the Phenomenology of Religion, Problems and Methods of the History of Religion, edited by U. Bianchi, C. J. Bleeker, A. Bausani, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1972, p. 39. [33]Jacques Waardenburg. Reflections on the Study of Religion: Including an Essay on the Work of Gerardus van der Leeuw, the Hague, Paris, New York: Mouton Publishers, 1978, pp. 105-106. [34]我觉得代表人物之中还应该加入布尔加科夫的名字。他在其《亘古不灭之光：观察与思辨》一书中，以整个上编的篇幅讨论宗教意识的本质问题。见[俄国]布尔加科夫著，王志耕、李春青译：《亘古不灭之光：观察与思辨》，昆明：云南人民出版社，1999年，第1-97页。 [35]Twiss and Conser（eds.）。 Experience of the Sacred: Readings in the Phenomenology of Religion, Hanover & London: Brown University Press, 1992. [36]Thomas Ryba. The Essence of Phenomenology and Its Meaning for the Scientific Study of Religion, New York: Peter Lang, 1991, p. 231. [37]我这里所列举的“清单”是在艾伦《宗教现象学》条目基础上有所增益而成的。艾伦的清单，见Douglas Allen. “Phenomenolog of Religion,” op. cit., pp. 272-285. [38]Douglas Allen. “Phenomenology of Religion,” op. cit., pp. 280-281. [39]关乎宗教现象学之反化约主义与捍卫宗教现象的自主性，参见陈立胜：《宗教现象的自主性：宗教现象学与化约主义的辩难及其反思》，收入中国社科院世界宗教研究所“’终极关切：宗教与哲学--宗教哲学‘2011年青岛论坛”论文集。 [40]Edward J. Jurji. The Phenomenology of Religion, Philadelphia: The Westminster Press，无出版年份，p. 1.
|