注释：
    ①Plato,Symposium,219 E-220 E,Charmides,153 A-C,Apology,28 E.
    ②阿忒奈奥斯(Athenaeus of Naucratis)对苏格拉底参与此战的事实提出质疑，但笔者认为其论证不足为信。关于其对柏拉图所记载之苏格拉底从军事实之批判(Athenaeus,The Deipnosophists,5.215 c-216 c)，笔者将另文论述。
    ③Thucydides,The Peloponnesian War,1.61-63.雅典一方的军队由两部分组成，分别是较早进入战场的阿尔克斯特拉托斯(Archestratus,son of Lycomedes)和较晚进入战场的卡利亚斯及另外四位将军所率领的军队。战斗过程中，雅典公民阵亡者150人——包括将军卡利亚斯，而波提戴亚人及其同盟者阵亡近300人。狄奥多罗斯称此役雅典人赢得了一次“引人瞩目的胜利”，似乎言过其实。见Diodorus Siculus,Library of History,12.37.
    ④Christopher Planeaux,Socrates,Alcibiades,and Plato's ta ΠOTEIΔEATIKA.Does the "Charmides" Have an Historical Setting? Mnemosyne,Fourth Series,Vol.52,Fasc.1(Feb.,1999).关于斯帕尔托罗斯城外之战，参阅Thucydides,The Peloponnesian War,2.79.
    ⑤Victor Ehrenberg指出，波提戴亚战事——即公元前432年(卡利亚斯)“波提戴亚战斗”——时间定位是一个极为复杂的问题。诸多学者曾进行尝试，但都无法避免与史料[如修昔底德及经济文献“古希腊铭文集(Inscriptiones Graecae)，，296”]产生冲突。见Victor Ehrenberg,Pericles and His Colleagues between 441 and 429 B.C.,The American Journal of Philology,Vol.66,No.2(1945),p.117.
    另外，西方学界对本次战事的具体时间定位各抒己见，且相互间差异极大。对此进行讨论的学者至少包括：Bruno Keil,Johann Wilhelm Adolf Kirchhoff,Konrad Kubicki,Walter Kolbe,Eduard Meyer,Georg Busolt,Karl Julius Beloch,Allen B.West,Frank Ezra Adcock,Harry Mortimer Hubbell,Felix Jacoby,Benjamin Dean Meritt,Henry Theodore Wade-Gery,David Moore Robinson,Arnold Wycombe Gomme,Victor Ehrenberg,Wesley E.Thompson,Christopher Planeaux等。参阅Allen B.West[The Chronology of the Years 432 and 431 B.C.,Classical Philology,Vol.10,No.1(Jan.,1915)],Harry Mortimer Hubbell[The Chronology of the Years 435-431 B.C.,Classical Philology,Vol.24,No.3(Jul.,1929)],Arnold Wycombe Gomme[I.G.i.296 and the Dates of TAΠOTEIΔEATIKA,The Classical Review,Vol.55,No.2(Sep.,1941)],Victor Ehrenberg[Pericks and His Colleagues between 441 and 429 B.C.,The American Journal of Philology,Vol.66,No.2(1945)],Wesley E.Thompson[The Chronology of 432/1,Hermes,96.Bd.,H.2(1968)],Christopher Planeaux[Socrates,Alciblades,and Plato's ta ΠOTEIΔEATIA.Does the "Charmides" Have an Historical Setting? Mnemosyne,Fourth Series,Vol.52,Face.1(Feb.,1999)]诸文。笔者无意对上述学者的论证进行评判，也无意对史事的具体时间进行考察，因此在表述中更多采取相对时间。
    ⑥Isocrates,Concerning the Team of Horses,29.彼处提供的雅典军队数字为1000，有别于修昔底德的1600。
    ⑦关于该演说词的背景，参阅Isocrates in Three Volumes,III,With An English Translation by Larue van Hook,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,London:William Heinemann LTD,1945,p.174及Diodorus Siculus,Library of History,13.74; Plutarch,Alcibiades,12.
    ⑧Jean Hatzfeld质疑伊索克拉底的史实准确性，见J.Hatzfeld,Alcibiade,étude sur l'histoire d'Athènes à la fin du Ve siècle,Paris:Presses Universitaires de France,1951,p.65 note 1.
    ⑨Thucydides,The Peloponnesian War,1.56.
    ⑩Thucydides,The Peloponnesian War,1.68.弗尔米奥将军率军赴色雷斯目的即为平定波提戴亚叛乱，参阅Isocrates in Three Volumes,III,With An English Translation by Larue van Hook,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,London:William Heinemann LTD,1945,p.193 note d.
    (11)Plato,Symposium,219 E.
    (12)Plato,Symposium,220 E.
    (13)Plutarch,Alcibiades,7.
    (14)Diogenes Laertius,Lives of Eminent Philosophers,2.5.23.然而，狄奥根尼·拉尔修认为是苏格拉底因勇敢而获奖，后来转赠亚西比德。
    (15)Isocrates,Concerning the Team of Horses,29.