[庄孔韶]“蝗虫”法与“鼹鼠”法——人类学及其相关学科的研究取向评论(11)
http://www.newdu.com 2024/11/24 04:11:41 中国社会学网 2008-08-04 1 庄孔韶 参加讨论
[33] 周作人:《知堂书话》(上)岳麓书社，1986，第183页。 [34] 刘铁良:《 文化巨变时代的新式民俗志-<中国民俗文化志>总序 》，北京师范大学学报，2006年第六期。 [35] M.C. Yang: A Chinese Village: Taitou, Shantung Province, New York：Columbia University Press, 1945; 庄孔韶等著：《时空穿行》(中国乡村人类学世纪回访)，117-119页;463-466页，北京，中国人民大学出版社，2004。 [36] C. P. Kottak：Anthropology: the Exploration of Human Diversity, Sixth Edition, McGraw-Hill,inc, 1994,pp.31-33; C. P. Kottak: Assault on Paradise: Social Change in a Brazilian Village, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.1992. [37] Faure and Siu: Down to Earth: The Territorial Bond in South China, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995. [38] 萧凤霞：《二十载华南研究之旅》，载华南研究会编：《学步与超越》(华南研究会论文集)，37页，文化创造出版社，2004。 [39] 华琛：《族人与外人：一个中国宗族的收养》，载《广西民族学院学报》，2004年(1)，100-107页。 [40] C. M. Arensberg: The Irish Countryman, 1伊凡-普里查：《社会人类学》(陈奇禄、王崧兴译)，99-101页，台北，唐山出版社，1997。 [41] C. M. Arensberg: The Irish Countryman, 1937, P.93. [42] 罗伯特·F.墨菲著，王卓君、吕迺基译：《文化与社会人类学引论》，292-293页，北京，商务出版社，2004。 [43] Derek Freeman, 1983 Margaret Mead and Samoa, New York: The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth, Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press. [44] 庄孔韶等著：《时空穿行》(中国乡村人类学世纪回访)，北京，中国人民大学出版社，2004。 [45] Conrad Phillip Kottak, Anthropology: The exploration of human diversity, Ninth edition, McoGraw Hill, 2002, P27-28. [46] Carol R. Ember and Melvin Ember: Cross- Cultural Research Methods. 2001. AltaMira Press. [47] 黄树民：《比较方法的运用与滥用：学科史述评》(张海洋译)，广西民族学院学报，2003年第3期，第32-38页。 [48] E. E.Evans-Pritchard: Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1937; Morphology and Function of Magic: A Comparative Study of Trobriand and Zande Ritual and Spells. In John Middleton, ed. Magic, Witchcring, and Curing, Garden City, New York: The Natural History Press. 1967.p22. [49] J. W. Whiting, I. L. Child and W. W. Lambert: Field Guide for a Study of Socialization. New York, London, and Sydney: John Wiley and Sons. 1966. [50] 庄孔韶研究小组：《中国内陆型和跨境型低龄女性性工作者艾滋病易感因素分析及对策研究》(作为文化的组织之理论实践之一) ，中国人民大学人类学研究所和CHARTS OfficeSCAWCO. [51] 庄孔韶：《银翅》，三联书店，2000年，第485页。 (庄孔韶 中国人民大学社会学系教授) On the Research Orientations of Anthropology and the Other Disciplines: Methods of“Locusts”and “Mole” Zhuang Kongshao Abstract: The paper is a study of the research orientations of anthropology and the other four or five disciplines such as sociology and folklore, etc., all of which do research in terms of the distributional features in some areas, metaphorically the methods of “locusts”, and in terms of particular location, metaphorically the methods of “mole”. All the research orientations are supposed to be treated equally, because the purpose of all the orientations is a holistic and ultimate knowledge of human beings in a deeper and broader sense of the term. Therefore there is a need for an understanding of different methods of locusts and moles for different disciplines and for a pursuit of the junctures and methods for mutual references and relations in different research frameworks and fieldwork for a cross-disciplinary study. Thus the paper offers a multi-exemplification and argumentation, as well as a prospect, for the methods of a cross-disciplinary study. (原文出处：《开放时代》2007年第3期) (责任编辑：admin) |