（34）参阅Sir David Percival, trans., Chinese Connoisseurship, the Ko Ku Yao Lun: The Essential Criteria of Antiquity, London: Faber, 1971。对照Clunas, Superfluous Things, pp. 11-13。
    （35）Ma Huan, Ying-yai Sheng-lan, “The Overall Survey of the Ocean‘s Shores”[1433], trans. and ed. J. V. G. Mills, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Extra Series No. XLII, 1970, pp. 69-180.
    （36）参阅Cao’s Preface序to the Gegu yaolun, p. 1a, entitled Gegu lunyao格古论要，in Hu Wenhuan胡文焕，comp., Gezhi congshu, Hangzhou, 1590s edition; National Library[Taibei]Rare Books Collection, and SKQSZM四库全书总目，pp. 123.4a-5a。另参阅L. Carrington Goodrich, et al, Dictionary of Ming Biography[明代人物传记辞典]，2 vols.，NY: Columbia University Press, 1976，pp. 1026-1027, and Clunas, Superfluous Things, pp. 11-12。
    （37）参阅Lach, Asia in the Making of Europe. Volume Ⅱ。 A Century of Wonder, Book 3，Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977, pp. 446-489、556-566。
    （38）Michael Ryan, “Assimilating New Worlds in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 23（1981）， pp. 519-527. 对照Pamela Smith and Paula Findlen, eds., Merchants and Marvels: Commerce, Science, and Art in Early Modern Europe, London and New York: Routledge, 2001, and Anthony Grafton, New Worlds, Ancient Texts: The Power of Tradition and the Shock of Discovery, Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1992, pp. 148-157 。
    （39）Ryan, “Assimilating New Worlds in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,” pp. 527-538. 另参阅D. E. Mungello, Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1989, p. 145, and Erik Zürcher, “In the Beginning”, pp. 152-153。
    （40）Cf. Elvin, The Structure of the Chinese Past, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1975, pp. 203-234.提出了重要的观点，参阅Nathan Sivin, “Imperial China: Has Its Present Past a Future”, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 38.2（Dec., 1978）， pp. 449-480。
    （41）参阅Sakai Tadao酒井忠夫，“Confucianism and Popular Education Works”，in Wm. Theodore de Bary, et al., Self and Society in Ming Thought, New York: Columbia University Press, 1970, pp. 331-341。另参阅Elman, A Cultural History of Civil Examinations, pp. 239-294, and Chia, Printing for Profit, pp. 234-239。
    （42）参阅Wang Baoping王宝平，“Mindai no kakushoka Ko Bunkan ni kan suru kan suru satsu”明代の刻书家胡文焕に关する考察，Ky ko 汲古36（1999），pp. 47-57。关于日本的版本，参阅Wang Baoping王宝平，“Riben Hu Wenhuan congshu jingyan lu”日本胡文焕丛书·经眼录，in Lu Jian陆坚and Wang Yong王勇，eds.，Zhongguo dianji zai Riben de liuchuan yu yingxiang中国典籍在日本的流播与影响，Hangzhou: Hangzhou daxue chuban she, 1990, pp. 322-347。关于中国的丛书，参阅Elman，From Philosophy To Philology: Social and Intellectual Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China, 2[nd] ed., Los Angeles: UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series, 2001, pp. 190-191。
    （43）SKQSZM四库全书总目，134.14b-15b. On the 200 versions，参阅Wu Weizu吴慰祖，compiler, Siku caijin shumu四库采进书目，Beijing: Commercial Press, 1960, p.81。另参阅Clunas, Superfluous Things, pp. 34、37-38、118。
    （44）虽然利玛窦（Matteo Ricci）于1598-1599年途经杭州，但在1611年三名耶稣会士应当地文人之邀来到杭州之后，杭州才成为耶稣会传播基督教的中心。参阅David Mungello, The Forgotten Christian of Hangzhou, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1994, pp. 3, 15-18, and Matteo Ricci, China in the Sixteenth Century: The Journals of Matteo Ricci: 1583-1610, translated into Latin by Father Nichola Trigault and into English by Louis J. Gallagher, S. J., New York: Random House, 1953, passim。
    （45）John Haeger, “The Significance of Confusion: The Origins of the T‘ai-p’ing yü-lan,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 88.3（1968）， pp. 401-410.参阅Y. W. Ma, “Pi-chi,” in William H. Nienhauser, Jr., ed., The Indiana Companion to Traditional Chinese Literature, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986, pp. 650-652, and Peter K. Bol, “A Literati Miscellany and Sung Intellectual History: The Case of Chang Lei‘s张耒Ming-tao tsa-chih明道杂志，” Journal of Sung-Yuan Studies 25（1995）， pp. 121-151。
    （46）Daiwie Fu, “A Contextual and Taxonomic Study of the ’Divine Marvels‘ and ’Strange Occurrences‘ in the Mengxi bitan梦溪笔谈，” Chinese Science 11（1993-1994）， pp. 3-35. 对照Nathan Sivin, “Shen Kua沈括，” in Sivin, Science in Ancient China, Great Yarmouth: Variorum, 1995, Ⅲ， p. 10。另参阅Russell Kirkland, “A World in Balance: Holistic Synthesis in the T’ai-p‘ing kuang-chi,” Journal of Sung-Yuan Studies 23（1993）， pp. 43-70。
    （47）Wang Baoping王宝平，“Mindai no kakushoka Ko Bunkan”，明代の刻書家胡文焕に関する考察，pp. 47-57。
    （48）参阅Elman, A Cultural History, pp. 646, 661-665。
    （49）Wang Baoping, “Mindai no kakushoka Ko Bunkan,” pp. 53-56.
    （50）对照Daston and Park, Wonders and the Order of Nature, pp. 68-88，涉及了近代早期欧洲收藏者和自然观念。
    （51）Wang Baoping, “Mindai no kakushoka Ko Bunkan”, pp. 52-55.另参阅Chum Shum, comp., An Annotated Catalog of Chinese Rare Books in the Harvard-Yenching Library, Shanghai: Cishu chuban she, 1998, Vol.1，312（#054），339（#0588 and 0590），其中包括了《格致丛书》的若干分册。
    （52）对照William Ashworth, Jr., “Emblematic Natural History of the Renaissance,” in Jardine, J.A.Secord, an E. C. Spary, eds., Cultures of Natural History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 17-37。
    （53）对照Paula Findlen, “Courting Nature,” in Jardine, Secord, an Spary, eds., Cultures of Natural History, pp. 57-74。
    （54）Findlen, Possessing Nature, pp. 1-3, 94, 396, 407.
    （55）Findlen, Possessing Nature, pp. 8, 15, 98, 121, 293.
    （56）Findlen, Possessing Nature, pp. 153-156, 198-201.
    （57）Findlen, Possessing Nature, pp. 208, 232, 286, and Lorraine Daston, “Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe,” pp. 93-124.
    （58）Findlen, Possessing Nature, pp. 10, 18-27, 32, 46, 398-405, and Anthony Grafton, Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450-1800, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991, pp. 1-5.