〔25〕Thompson,The Interpretation of Cultures(New York, 1973)。 〔26〕Theda Skocpol,ed.,Vision and Mcthod in HistoricalSociology(Cambridge,1984),P.219. 〔27〕曾技盛:《阿尔杜塞》,第162-167,台北:远流,1990年版。 〔28〕E.P Thompson,The Poverty of Theory and OtherEssays(New York,1978)。 〔29〕Pierre Bourdieu,Distinction:ASocialCritiqueofthe Judgment of Taste,tr.Richard Nice (Cambridge,Mass.,1984)。 〔30〕Richard Jenkins,Pierre Bourdieu(London,1992)。 〔31〕Applely,Op.cit.,PP.55-56. 〔32〕同上,页30-31。 〔33〕“创造历史”(Faire de I'histoirc )第一卷,页147 起,引用利科书(上注),页56。 〔34〕Royer Chartier,"Intellectual History onSociocultu-ral History?the French Trajectorics,"in Dominick La Capra and Steven L.Kaplan,eds.,Modern Europcan Intellectual History: Re-appruisals and New Perspectivs(Ithaca,1982)。 〔35〕Vincent B.Leitch,"Writing Cultural History:theCase of Postmodernism,"P.171. 〔36〕Richard Wolin,The Terms of Cultural Criticism:the Frankfurt School,Existentialism,Poststructuralism(New York,1992),PP.185-186. 〔37〕Appleby,Telling the Truth About History,P.224. 〔38〕John E.Toews."Intellectual History after theLinguistic Turn,"American Historical Review,92(1982),PP.879-908. 〔39〕Joan Wallach Scott,Gender and the politics ofHistory(New York,1988)。 〔40〕Appleby,Telling the truth about History,PP.226-230. 〔41〕Appleby,Heller and Ferenc Fecher,The PostmodernPo-litical Condition (Cambridge UK:Polity press,1988),PP.35-36. 〔42〕Bernard Duyfhuizen,"Deconstruction and FeministLi-terary Theory I,"Feminism and Institution,Dialogue on FeministTheory.ed.Linda Kauffman (()xford:Basil Blackwell,1989),P. 174. 〔43〕Kathleen Canning."Feminist History after theLinguistic Turn:Historicizing Discourse and Experience,"Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,19-2(Winter 1994),PP.368-370. 〔44〕例如在80年代初的Frances Barthowski,"Feminism anddeconstruction, a union forever deferred,"Enclitic,4-2(1980),PP.70-77.,在80年代中叶有Bernard Decyfhüzen,"Review essay:deconstruction and feminist literary theory",Tulsa Studies inWomen's Literature,3-1/2(Spring/Fall1984),PP.'159-169., 晚期有bella Brodzki and Celeste Schenck,"Criticus Interrepters: U-ncoupling Feminism and Deconstruction,"Feminism andInstitut-ions,Dialogue on feminist Theory,ed. Linda Kauffman (Oxford:B-asil Blackwell,1989),PP.194-208. 〔45〕Lois McNay,Foucault and Feminism:Power,Gender andthe Self(Cambridge,UK:Polity press,1992),PP.192-193. 〔46〕最强烈的批评见于以下各作者之著作内:Anzaldica andMoraga,1981;Hools,1981,1990;Smith,1983;Spillers,1985;Hrinh, 1988;collins,1989; Hurtado,1989;Mohanty,Russo and Torres,1991; H-igginbotham,1992.录自Canning,"History after the Liguistic Turn, "P.371.footnote 7. 〔47〕Dinise Riley,Am I That Name? Feminism and theCate-gory of "Women"in History (1988),PP.4-7,99. 〔48〕John Wallach Scott,Op.cit., 〔49〕Canning,"History after the Linguistic Turn",pp.372-373. 〔50〕Allan Megill,"The Reception of Foucault byHistorians,"Journal of the History of ldras,48-1(Jan.-Mar.,1987),P. 117. 〔51〕同前注,页124-126。 〔52〕Hayden White,"Foucault Decoded:Notes fromUnderground",History and Theory,12(1973),PP.23-54;George Huppert,"Div-inatio et Eruditio:Thoughts on Foucault,"History and Theory,13(1974),PP.191-207. 〔53〕Allan Megill,"foucault,Structuralism and the Ends of History,"Journal of Modern History,51(1978),PP.451-503;M. Poster,"Foucault and History,"Social Research, 49(1982),PP.116-142. 〔54〕Arthur Still and Irving Volody,ed.,Rewriting theH-istory of Madness:Studies in Foucault's "Histoire de laFolie"(London,1991)。 〔55〕Gerard Noiriel,"Foucault and History:the Lessonsof a Disillusion,"The Journal of Modern History,66-3( September 1991),p.546.footnote 1. 〔56〕同前注,页564-565。 〔57〕Lynn Hunt,"Introduction:History,Culture,and Text,"inThe New Cultural History,ed.,Lynn Hunt(Berkeley,1989),PP.1 -22. 〔58〕Noiriel,"Foucault and History,"p.566. 〔59〕同前注,页548注八。兹略作品名称。 〔60〕Allan Megill,"Reception of Foucault,"p.132. 〔61〕Guy Alitto,"Metahistorical Speculetion in light ofrecent events:Reevaluating Liang Shumingo Predictions on theConfucianization of human culture."Centennial Symposium on SunYat-sen's Founding of the Kuamintang for Revolution( Taipei, Taiwan,R.O.C.,November 19-23,1994),p.2. 〔62 〕AnderwBeards, "RevervingHistoricalSkepticism:Bernard Lonergan on the Writing of History,"History and The. ory,33.2(1994),pp.198-219,提出“观点论(Perspectivism)”, 以应付此冲击,但提出者是一位哲学家。 〔63〕参考拙著《西洋近代文化史》。 〔64〕请参阅高宣扬:‘沟通行动的语用论问题’,《实用主义和语用论》,第443-512页,台北:远流,1994年版。 〔65〕保罗·法伊尔阿本德著、周昌忠译:《反对方法--无政府主义知识论纲要》,第4页,上海译文出版社,1992年版。
(责任编辑:admin) |