|
注释： ①托布约尔·克努成：《国际关系理论史》，余万里、何宗强译，天津人民出版社2004年版，第6页。 ②詹姆斯，多尔蒂、小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫：《争论中的国际关系理论》第五版，阎学通、陈寒溪译，世界知识出版社2003年版，第669页。 ③参见任东波：《欧洲经验与世界历史：英国学派的封闭性与开放性》，《吉林大学社会科学学报》2007年第2期。 ④Alex J. Bellamy, "Introduction: International Society and the English School", in Alex J. Bellamy, ed., International Society and its Critics, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 2-3. ⑤Peter Wilson, "The English School of International Relations: A Reply to Sheila Grader", Review of International Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1989, pp. 55-56. ⑥Roger Epp, "The English School on the Frontiers of International Society: A Hermeneutic Recollection", Review of International Studies, Vol. 24, The Eighty Years' Crisis 1919-1999, 1998, pp. 48-50. ⑦Alex J. Bellamy, "Introduction: International Society and the English School", in Alex J. Bellamy, ed., International Society and its Critics, pp 7-8. ⑧Richard Little, "Neorealism and the English School: A Methodological, Ontological and Theoretical Reassessment", European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1995, pp. 15-16. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London: Macmillan, 1977, p. 84. ⑨Martha Finnemore, "Exporting the English School?", Review of International Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2001, p. 512. ⑩Richard Little, "The English School's Contribution to the Study of International Relations ", European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2000, pp. 395-422. (11)Scott M. Thomas, "Faith, History and Martin Wight: The Role of Religion in the Historical Sociology of the English School of International Relations", International Affairs, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2001, p. 905. (12)Andrew Linklater and Hidemi Suganami, The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 84. (13)Andrew Hurrell, "Keeping History, Law and Political Philosophy Firmly within the English School", Review of International Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2001, p. 493. (14)Richard Little, "The English School and World History", in Alex J. Bellamy, ed., International Society and its Critics, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 45-63. (15)巴里·布赞：《英国学派及其当下发展》，《国际政治研究》2007年第2期，第106页。 (16)Paul A. Roth, "Narrative Explanations: The Case of History", History and Theory，Vol. 27, No. 1, 1988, pp. 1-13. (17)Deborah Schiffrin, In Other Words: Variation in Reference and Narrative, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 18. (18)Hayden White, "The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory", History and Theory, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1984, p. 32, p. 33. (19)Mona Baker, Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account, New York: Routledge, 2010, p. 169. (20)Anthony Paul Kerby, Narrative and the Self, Indiana University Press, 1991, p. 3. (21)J  rn Rüsen, History: Narration, Interpretation, Orientation, New York: Berghahn Books, 2005, p. 2.(22)布鲁纳认为，叙事模式“力求将其永恒的奇迹置于经验的细节之中，并把经验设置在时间和空间之内”。Jerome Bruner，Actual Minds, Possible Worlds，Harvard University Press，1986,p.13. (23)巴里·布赞：《英国学派及其当下发展》，《国际政治研究》2007年第2期，第106页。 (24)参见J  rn Rüsen，"Historical Narration: Foundation, Types, Reason"，History and Theory, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1987, pp. 87-97。(25)赫德利，布尔：《无政府社会：世界政治秩序研究》第2版，张小明译，世界知识出版社2003年版，第7、10—11页。 (26)Richard Rosecrance, "International Theory Revisited ", International Organization, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1981, p. 693. (27)即Systems of States，复数暗含怀特注重历史比较研究的取向。参见Martin Wight, Systems of States, edited by Hedley Bull, Leicester University Press, 1977, pp. 22-45。“尽管怀特提供了很少的答案，但他提出了许多问题。”Ian Hall, The International Thought of Martin Wight, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, p. 158。 (28)Hedley Bull, "Introduction: Martin Wight and the study of international relations", in Martin Wight, Systems of States, p. 19. (29)Robert O. Keohane, "Review: International Theory: The Three Traditions", The American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No. 4, 1992, p. 1113. (30)Stanley Hoffman, "Hedley Bull and His Contribution to International Relations", International Affairs, Vol. 62, No. 2, 1986, p. 181.詹姆斯，德·代元：《国际关系理论批判》，秦治来译，浙江人民出版社2003年版，第199页。 (31)Hedley Bull and Adam Watson, eds., The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, p. 1. (32)John M. Roberts, "Review: The Expansion of International Society", The English Historical Review, Vol. 101, No. 398, 1986, p. 201. (33)Steven Metz, "Review: The Expansion of International Society", The Journal of Politics, Vol. 48, No. 1, 1986, p. 253. (34)John M. Roberts, "Review: The Expansion of International Society", The English Historical Review, Vol. 101, No. 398, 1986, p. 206. (35)Gene M. Lyons, "Review: The Study of International Relations in Great Britain: Further Connections", World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 4, 1986, p. 636. (36)Barry Buzan, "Review: The Evolution of International Society", International Affairs, Vol. 68, No. 4, 1992, p. 708. (37)Barry Buzan and Richard Little, "Introduction to the 2009 Reissue", in Adam Watson, The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis, Reissue with a new introduction by Barry Buzan and Richard Little, London: Routledge, 2009, p. xxix. (38)Adam Watson, "Systems of States", Review of International Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1990, p. 109. (39)Adam Watson, Hegemony & History, Routledge, 2007, p. 5. (40)Adam Watson, The Limits of Independence: Relations Between States in the Modern World, Routledge, 1997, p. 20. (41)Kai Alderson and Andrew Hurrell, edited and introduced, Hedley Bull on International Society, St Martin's Press, 2000, p. 35. (42)参见赫德利·布尔：《无政府社会：世界政治秩序研究》第2版，第6页。 (43)Chris Brown, "International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?", Review of International Studies, Vol. 21, No 2, 1995, pp. 183-184. (44)Kai Alderson and Andrew Hurrell, edited and introduced, Hedley Bull on International Society, p. 7. (45)巴里·布赞、理查德·利特尔：《世界历史中的国际体系——国际关系研究的再建构》，刘德斌主译，高等教育出版社2004年版，“译者序”第Ⅻ页。 (46)吕森认为，批判叙事是以人类有能力拒绝世代相传的传统、规则以及原则为基础的，这就为新模式提供了空间。 (47)巴里·布赞、理查德·利特尔：《世界历史中的国际体系——国际关系研究的再建构》，第16—19页。 (48)Barry Buzan, "From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School", International Organization, Vol. 47, No 3, 1993, p. 329。 (49)Barry Buzan, From International to World Society?──English School theory and the social structure of globalization, pp. 16-24.布赞这本著作承认了英国学派思想的弱点和含糊不清的领域并试图对其进行系统性的表述。这也在相当程度上引发了年青一代国际关系理论家的兴趣。Ewan Harrison，"Review: From International to World Society: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation", Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 4, Iss. 3, 2005, pp. 352-353. (50)Barry Buzan, "From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School", International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 3, 1993, p. 352. (51)Richard Little, "The English School vs American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language?", Review of International Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2003, p. 444. (52)Barry Buzan and Richard Little, "The Idea of ‘International System': Theory Meets History", International Political Science Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1994, pp. 231-255. (53)Richard Little, "The English School and World History", in Alex J. Bellamy, ed., International Society and its Critics, Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 47. (54)巴里·布赞、理查德·利特尔：《世界历史中的国际体系——国际关系研究的再建构》，第68页。 (55)Paul Ricoeur, Time and Narrative(Volume 1), Translated by Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer, University of Chicago Press, 1984, p. 52. (56)Steve Smith, "Review: International systems in world history: remaking the study of International Relations", International Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 4, 2000, p. 833. (57)Kerwin Lee Klein, "In Search of Narrative Mastery: Postmodernism and the People without History ", History and Theory, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1995, pp. 275-298. (58)J  rn Rüsen, "The Horror of Ethnocentrism-Westernization, Cultural Difference, and Strife in Understanding Non-Western Pasts in Historical Studies", History and Theory, Vol. 47, May, 2008, p. 261.(59)Paul Ricoeur, Time and Narrative(Volume 3), p. 247. Finn Fuglestad, The Ambiguities of History: The Problem of Ethnocentrism in Historical Writing, Oslo: Academic Press, 2005, p. 139. (60)J  rn Rüsen, "Some Theoretical Approaches to Intercultural Comparative Historiography", History and Theory, Vol. 35, No.4, 1996, p. 9.(61)巴里·布赞、理查德·利特尔：《世界历史中的国际体系——国际关系研究的再建构》，“中文版序言”第1页。 (62)伊弗·诺伊曼、奥勒·韦弗尔：《未来国际思想大师》，肖锋、石泉译，北京大学出版社2003年版，第58页。 (63)Hayden White, "The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory", History and Theory, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1984,p. 5. (64)从国际关系学科来看，“关于现代世界政治秩序的各种正统理论都是不充分的，这是因为它们对现代国际秩序发展的分析过于狭隘，仅仅聚焦于欧洲国家体系”。Edward Keene，Beyond the Anarchical Society：Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 145。 (65)Michael Bamberg, "Considering Counter Narratives", in Michael Bamberg and Molly Andrews, eds, Considering Counter-Narratives: Narrating, Resisting, Making Sense, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub., 2004, p. 358. Deborah Schiffrin, In other Words: Variation in Reference and Narrative, Cambridge University Press, 2006, p. 20. (66)关于多元性和开放性的论述有很多，如布罗代尔认为，“无论研究过去或研究现在，都必须清醒地意识到社会实践的这种多元性，这是人文科学共同的方法论”。费尔南·布罗代尔：《资本主义论丛》，顾良、张慧君译，中央编译出版社1997年版，第175页。 (责任编辑：admin) |