〔37〕Appleby,Telling the Truth About History,P.224.
    〔38〕John E.Toews."Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn,"American Historical Review,92（1982），PP.879-908.
    〔39〕Joan Wallach Scott,Gender and the politics of History（New York,1988）。
    〔40〕Appleby,Telling the truth about History,PP.226-230.
    〔41〕Appleby,Heller and Ferenc Fecher,The Postmodern Po-litical Condition （Cambridge UK:Polity press,1988），PP.35-36.
    〔42〕Bernard Duyfhuizen,"Deconstruction and Feminist Li-terary Theory I,"Feminism and Institution,Dialogue on FeministTheory.ed.Linda Kauffman （（）xford:Basil Blackwell,1989），P.174.
    〔43〕Kathleen Canning."Feminist History after the Linguistic Turn:Historicizing Discourse and Experience,"Signs:Journal of Women in Culture and Society,19-2（Winter 1994），PP.368-370.
    〔44〕例如在80年代初的Frances Barthowski,"Feminism anddeconstruction,a union forever deferred,"Enclitic,4-2（1980），PP.70-77.,在80年代中叶有Bernard Decyfhüzen,"Review essay:deconstruction and feminist literary theory",Tulsa Studies inWomen's Literature,3-1/2（Spring/Fall1984），PP.'159-169.,晚期有bella Brodzki and Celeste Schenck,"Criticus Interrepters:U-ncoupling Feminism and Deconstruction,"Feminism and Institut-ions,Dialogue on feminist Theory,ed.Linda Kauffman （Oxford:B-asil Blackwell,1989），PP.194-208.
    〔45〕Lois McNay,Foucault and Feminism:Power,Gender and the Self（Cambridge,UK:Polity press,1992），PP.192-193.
    〔46〕最强烈的批评见于以下各作者之著作内：Anzaldica and Moraga,1981;Hools,1981,1990;Smith,1983;Spillers,1985;Hrinh,1988;collins,1989; Hurtado,1989;Mohanty,Russo and Torres,1991; H-igginbotham,1992.录自Canning,"History after the Liguistic Turn,"P.371.footnote 7.
    〔47〕Dinise Riley,Am I That Name? Feminism and the Cate-gory of "Women"in History （1988），PP.4-7,99.
    〔48〕John Wallach Scott,Op.cit.,
    〔49〕Canning,"History after the Linguistic Turn",pp.372-373.
    〔50〕Allan Megill,"The Reception of Foucault by Historians,"Journal of the History of ldras,48-1（Jan.-Mar.,1987），P.117.
    〔51〕同前注，页124-126。
    〔52〕Hayden White,"Foucault Decoded:Notes from Underground",History and Theory,12（1973），PP.23-54;George Huppert,"Div-inatio et Eruditio:Thoughts on Foucault,"History and Theory,13（1974），PP.191-207.
    〔53〕Allan Megill,"foucault,Structuralism and the Ends of History,"Journal of Modern History,51（1978），PP.451-503;M. Poster,"Foucault and History,"Social Research,49（1982），PP.116-142.
    〔54〕Arthur Still and Irving Volody,ed.,Rewriting the H-istory of Madness:Studies in Foucault's "Histoire de la Folie"（London,1991）。
    〔55〕Gerard Noiriel,"Foucault and History:the Lessons of a Disillusion,"The Journal of Modern History,66-3（ September 1991），p.546.footnote 1.
    〔56〕同前注，页564-565。
    〔57〕Lynn Hunt,"Introduction:History,Culture,and Text,"inThe New Cultural History,ed.,Lynn Hunt（Berkeley,1989），PP.1 -22.
    〔58〕Noiriel,"Foucault and History,"p.566.
    〔59〕同前注，页548注八。兹略作品名称。
    〔60〕Allan Megill,"Reception of Foucault,"p.132.
    〔61〕Guy Alitto,"Metahistorical Speculetion in light of recent events:Reevaluating Liang Shumingo Predictions on the Confucianization of human culture."Centennial Symposium on SunYat-sen's Founding of the Kuamintang for Revolution（ Taipei,Taiwan,R.O.C.,November 19-23,1994），p.2.
    〔62 〕Anderw Beards,"Reverving Historical Skepticism:Bernard Lonergan on the Writing of History,"History and The.ory,33.2（1994），pp.198-219，提出“观点论（Perspectivism）”， 以应付此冲击，但提出者是一位哲学家。
    〔63〕参考拙著《西洋近代文化史》。
    〔64〕请参阅高宣扬：‘沟通行动的语用论问题’，《实用主义和语用论》，第443-512页，台北：远流，1994年版。
    〔65〕保罗·法伊尔阿本德著、周昌忠译：《反对方法--无政府主义知识论纲要》，第4页，上海译文出版社，1992年版。