⑥参见Robert B. Townsend, “The State of the History Department: A Report on the 1999 Department Survey, “Perspectives on History, vol. 39, no. 8, 2001; Marcus Grser, “World History in a Nation-State: The Transnational Disposition in Historical Writing in the United States,” Journal of American History, vol. 95, 2009, pp. 1038-1052.
    ⑦参见Bruce Cumings, “Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies during and after the Cold War,” in Christopher Simpson, ed., Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences during the Cold War, New York: New Press, 1998, pp. 159-188.
    ⑧参见Thomas Bender, “Politics, Intellect, and the American University, 1945-1995,” Daedalus, vol 1261, 1997, pp. 1-38.
    ⑨参见John Higham, History: Professional Scholarship in America, 2[nd] ed., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
    ⑩参见Robert B. Townsend, “The Status of Women and Minorities in the History Profession, 2008,” Perspectives on History, vol. 46, no. 6（September 2008）。
    （11）参见Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
    （12）Victoria E. Bonnelli and Lynn Hunt, eds., Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture, Berkely: University of California Press, 1999.
    （13）参见一部非常有影响力的作品，Howard Zinn, A People‘s History of the United States: 1942-Present, New York: Harper Collins, 1980.
    （14）Michael N. Bastedo, “Curriculum in Higher Education: The Historical Roots of Contemporary Issues,” in Philip G. Altbach, Patricia J. Gumport and Robert O. Berdahl, eds., American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005, pp. 462-485.
    （15）例如，关于这个课题有一个批判性的叙述。Francois Cusset, French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
    （16）参见Dominic Sachsenmaier, Global Perspectives on Global History: Theories and Approaches in a Connected World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, Chapter 2.
    （17）参见Dominic Sachsenmaier, Global Perspectives on Global History: Theories and Approaches in a Connected World.
    （18）参见Dominic Sachsenmaier, Global Perspectives on Global History: Theories and Approaches in a Connected World.
    （19）例如，Dirk van Laak, ber alles in der Welt: Deutscher Imperialismus im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, München: C. H. Beck, 2005.
    （20）例如，Birthe Kundrus, Moderne Imperialisten: Das Kaiserreich im Spiegel seiner Kolonien, Kln: Bhlau, 2003. 总体而言，该研究借鉴了汉娜·阿伦特《极权主义的起源》一书的框架，该书明显的特点是跨越国家范围。但是，当前的历史研究很大程度上是基于一手材料的分析。
    （21）例如，Sebastian Conrad, Globalisierung und Nation im Deutschen Kaiserreich, München: C. H. Beck, 2006.
    （22）其中一例是“Global History-The World, 1000-2000”系列研究，其中8卷是对过去一千年全球历史的记述。
    （23）Jürgen Osterhammel, Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19, Jahrhunderts, München: C. H. Beck, 2009. 英文版即将由普林斯顿大学出版社出版。