|
[67] See Paul Kahn, Putting Liberalism in its Place, Princeton University Press, 2008, P263:“Revolutionary opposition is always pursued in the name of the people. Modernity could not be the age of people‘s republics without validating a revolutionary tradition that always makes possible a challenge to the government’s claim to represent the popular sovereign.”在这个意义上，辛亥革命以来的中国宪政动荡史不应该被理解为例外，而恰恰是革命建国的现代共和制国家的常态。相反，美国这样被认为是宪政稳定的国家恰恰是例外。 [68] See Carl Schmitt, Political Theology, G. Schwab trans. MIT Press, 1985, [1922]; Robert Burt, “American Constitutional Law and the Teaching of Parables”, 93Yale L.J.455-502（1984）。 [69] See Paul Kahn, Putting Liberalism in its Place, Princeton University Press, 2008, P268. [70] See Edward Corwin, “The Constitution as Instrument and as Symbol”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 30, No. 6 （Dec., 1936）， P1071-1085; Max Lerner, “Constitution and Court as Symbols,” 46 Yale L.J.1290（1937）。 [71] Thomas Grey, “The Constitution as Scripture,” 37 Stan. L.R. 1（1984）。 [72] See Robert Cover, Foreword: Nomos and Narrative, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 4（1983）。 [73] See Amar, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction, Yale University Press, 1998. [74] See e.g., Jack Balkin, “Framework Orignalism and The Living Constitution”, 103 Nw. L. Rev. 549 （2009）。 [75] See Ronald Dworkin, Law‘s Empire, Harvard University Press, 1988. [76] See Davison Douglas,“The Rhetorical Uses of Marbury v.Madison:The Emergence of a ’Grea tCase,‘”38Wake For.L.Rev. 375（2003）， P387-407.该文通过考证发现，马伯里案在整个十九世纪默默无闻，只是到了二十世纪之后才逐渐成为经典案例，为人津津乐道。 [77] See Paul Kahn, The Reign of Law: Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America, Yale Universtity Press, 1997, P10: “Marbury seeks to displace a politics of revolution by the rule of law. 10The Court’s claim that ours is to be a government of law does not reflect a fact; it states an ambition, a point from which it will enter a contest of political meaning. Marbury, then, represents the judicial contestation of the meaning of American political life in response to Jefferson‘s successful electoral campaign to wage a new revolution. Revolution and law continue to occupy the American political imagination as competing, yet related, forces.” [78] 这方面的研究最经典的是Keith Whittington, Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy, Princeton University Press, 2007. [79] 两者的区分参见Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political, G.Schwab trans., University of Chicago Press, 1996. [80] Alexander Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, Yale University Press, 1962, P16-23. [81] Alexander Bickel, The Morality of Consent, Yale University Press, 1975, P25, P89. [82] Alexander Bickel, The Morality of Consent, Yale University Press, 1975, P3. [83] See the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2. [84] See Paul Kahn, The Reign of Law: Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America, Yale Universtity Press, 1997, P169. [85] Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 （1896） [86] Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 （1992） , at2816. [87] Ibid, at 2814 [88] See Sanford Levinson, Constitutional Faith, Princeton University Press, 1989, P155-179. [89] See Paul Kahn, The Reign of Law: Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America, Yale Universtity Press, 1997, P206-229. [90] See Ernst Kantorowitcz, The King’s Two Bodies, Princeton University Press, 1997. [91] Ibid, 42-86. [92] Edmund Burke, Reflection on the French Revolution, J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd,1955, P31. [93] 关于美国的认同焦虑，See Samuel Hungtington, Who Are We? :The Challenges to American National Identity, Simon and Schuster, 2004. [94] See David Barrows, “The Constitution as an Element of Stability in American Life”, Vol. 185, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2 （1936）； [95] See Patrick Weil, Qu‘ est ce qu’un fran?ais ? Histoire de la nationalité fran?aise depuis la Révolution, Paris, Grasset, 2002. （forthcoming in English as How to be French? A Nationality in the Making since 1789, from Duke University Press）。 感谢Partick Weil教授在这点上的提示。 [96] 参见甘阳：《通三统》，三联书店2007年版。 [97] See Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic, Princeton University Press, 2010, forthcoming.
|