|
(93) George T. Yu, Party Politics in Republican China, The Kuomintang 1912-1924, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966. (94) Walter E. Gourlay, “Reviews on Party Politics in Republican China, The Kuomintang 1912-1924”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 82, No. 2 (Jun., 1967), pp. 310-311. (95) William G. Saywell, “Reviews on Party Politics in Republican China, The Kuomintang 1912-1924”,Pacific Affairs, Vol. 39, No. 1/2 (Spring-Summer, 1966), pp. 163-164. (96) Howard L. Boorman, “Reviews on Party Politics in Republican China, The Kuomintang 1912-1924”, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 26, No. 4 (Aug., 1967), pp. 704-705. (97) Martin Bernal, “Reviews on Party Politics in Republican China,The Kuomintang 1912-1924”,Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 1, No. 4 (1967), pp. 409-410. (98) Charles Vevier, The United States and China, 1906-1913: A Study of Finance and Diplomacy, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1955. (99) E-tu Zen Sun, Chinese Railways and British Interests, 1898-1911, New York: King's Crown Press, 1954. (100) Charles F. Remer, “Review on Chinese Railways and British Interests, 1898-1911”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 299, Air Power and National Security (May, 1955), p. 190. (101) Allen S. Whiting, Soviet Police in China, 1917-1924, New York: Columbia University Press, 1954; London: Oxford University Press, 1955. (102) J. K. Fairbank,“Reviews on Soviet Police in China, 1917-1924”,American Slavic and East European Review, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Oct., 1955), p. 417. (103) Wei Henry, China and Soviet Russia,N. J.: Van Nostrand, 1956. (104) Peter S. H. Tang, Russian and Soviet Policy in Manchuria and Outer Mongolia, 1911-1931, Durham: Duke University Press, 1959. (105) Marius B. Jansen, The Japanese and Sun Yat-sen, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954. (106) Hyman Kublin, “Reviews on The Japanese and Sun Yat-sen”, The Far Eastern Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May, 1955), p. 424. (107) Allan B. Cole,“Reviews on The Japanese and Sun Yat-sen”,Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 24, No. 2 (May, 1955), p. 204. (108) Herbert Passin,“Reviews on The Japanese and Sun Yat-sen”,Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 300, Internal Security and Civil Rights (Jul., 1955), pp. 175-176.; W. G. Beasley, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), Vol. 32, No. 1 (Jan., 1956), p. 126. (109) Masaru Ikei,“Japan's Response to the Chinese Revolution of 1911”, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Feb., 1966), pp. 213-227. (110) Hsueh Chun-tu, Huang Hsing and The Chinese Revolution, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1960. (Winter, 1962-1963), pp. 394-396.; J. D. Chinnery,Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol. 27, No. 1 (1964), p. 200. (111) Earl Swisher, “Reviews on Huang Hsing and The Chinese Revolution”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 342, American Foreign Policy Challenged (Jul., 1962), pp. 178-179. (112) Ch' en Jerome, Yuan Shih-K' ai. 1859-1916, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1961. (113) Yu-ning Li,“Reviews on Yuan Shih-K'ai. 1859-1916”,The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Nov., 1962), p. 97. (114) Shao-chuan Leng&Norman D. Palmer, Sun Yat-sen and Communism, New York: Praeger, 1960. (115) Harold Z. Schiffrin,“Reviews on Sun Yat-sen and Communism”,The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Feb., 1962), pp. 222-223. (116) Harold Schiffrin, “Sun Yat-sen's Early Land Policy: The Origin and Meaning of ‘Equalization of Land Rights’”,The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4 (Aug., 1957), pp. 549-564. (117) Robert A. Scalapino&Harold Schiffrin,“Early Socialist Currents in the Chinese Revolutionary Movement: Sun Yat-sen versus Liang Chi-chào”, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May, 1959), pp. 321-342. (责任编辑：admin) |