|
(165) Michael H. Hunt, “College Americans in the China Market: Economic Opportunities and Economic Nationalism, 1890s-1931”,The Business History Review, Vol. 51, No. 3 (Autumn, 1977), pp. 277-307, (166) Peter Lowe, Great Britain and Japan, 1911-1915: A Study of British Far Eastern Policy, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1969. (167) Albert A. Altman&Harold Z. Schiffrin,“Sun Yat-sen and the Japanese: 1914-1916”,Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4 1972), pp. 385-400. (168) J. Kim Munholland, “The French Connection that Failed: France and Sun Yat-Sen, 1900-1908A”, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Nov., 1972), pp. 77-95. (169) Dan N. Jacobs,“Recent Russian Material on Soviet Advisers in China: 1923-1927”, The China Quarterly, No. 41 (Jan.-Mar., 1970), pp. 103-112. (170) Don Price,Russia and the Roots of the Chinese Revolution 1896-1911, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974. (171) Lyon Sharman, Sun Yat-sen; His Life and Its Meaning, Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1968. (172) Harold Z. Schiffrin, Sun Yat-sen and the Origins of the Chinese Revolution, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1968.; London: IBEG, 1969. (173) Ernest P. Young, “Reviews on Sun Yat-sen and the Origins of the Chinese Revolution”, The American Historical Review, Vol. 75, No. 6 (Oct., 1970), p. 1762. (174) R. Bruce, Sun Yat-sen, London: Oxford University Press, 1969. (175) C. Martin Wilbur, Sun Yat-Sen: Frustrated Patriot, New York: Columbia University Press, 1976. (176) Lien Chan, “Sun Yat-sen on Land Utilization”,Agricultural History, Vol. 42, No. 4 (Oct., 1968), pp. 297-303. (177) Key Ray Chong, “Cheng Kuan-ying (1841-1920): A Source of Sun Yat-sen's Nationalist Ideology?”, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Feb., 1969), pp. 247-267. (178) Lin Sein,“Sun Yat-sen and Henry George: The Essential Role of Land Policy in Their Doctrines”,American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Apr., 1974), pp. 201-220. (179) Robert E. Bedeski, “The Concept of the State: Sun Yat-sen and Mao Tse-tung”, The China Quarterly, No. 70 (Jun.,1977), pp. 338-354. (180) Chun-tu Hsueh, Revolutionary leaders of Modern China, New York, London&Toronto: Oxford University Press. 1971. (181) K. S. Liew, Struggle for Democracy; Sung Chiao-Jen and the 1911 Chinese Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971. (182) Ernest P. Young, “Reviews on Struggle for Democracy; Sung Chiao-Jen and the 1911 Chinese Revolution”, The Journalof Asian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Aug., 1972), pp. 934-935. (183) Brian L. Evans,“Reviews on Struggle for Democracy; Sung Chiao-Jen and the 1911 Chinese Revolution”, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 45, No. 2 (Summer, 1972), pp. 284-285. (184) Roger V. Des Forges, Hsi-liang and the Chinese national revolution, New Haven&London: Yale University Press, 1973. (185) Christopher Howe, “Review on Hsi-liang and the Chinese national revolution”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol. 37,No. 3 (1974), p. 715. (186) Ernest P. Young, The Presidency of Yuan Shik-K'ai: Liberalism and Dictatorships in Early Republican China, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1977. (187) Craig N. Canning, “Review on The Presidency of Yuan Shik-K'ai: Liberalism and Dictatorships in Early Republican China”, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3 (May, 1978), p. 516. (188) Michael Gasster, Chinese Intellectuals and the Revolution of 1911 (Seattle, 1969), p. 229. (189) Sidney H. Chang&Leonard H. D. Gordon,Bibliography of Sun Yat-sen in China's Republican Revolution, 1885-1925, Lanham, New York&Oxford: University Press of America, 1998. (190) Marie Claire Bergère, “Review on Bibliography of Sun Yat-sen in China's Republican Revolution, 1885-1925”, The China Quarterly, No. 163 (Sap., 2000), p. 868. (191) Julie Lee Wei, Ramon H. Maroon&Donald G. Gillin (ed), Prescriptions for Saving China: Selected Writings of Sun Yat-sen, Stanford&Calif.: Hoover Institution Press; Stanford University, 1994. (责任编辑：admin) |