(14)Young,"American Historians Confront 'The Transforming Hand of Revolution'," in Hoffman,et al.,eds.,The Transforming Hand of Revolution,pp.377-378.
    (15)Merrill Jensen,The Articles of Confederation:An Interpretation of the Social-Constitutional History of the American Revolution 1774-1781,Madison,Wisconsin:The University of Wisconsin Press,1966(1st ed.1940),pp.6-14.
    (16)Young,"American Historians Confront 'The Transforming Hand of Revolution'," in Hoffman,et al.,eds.,The Transforming Hand of Revolution,pp.380-383.
    (17)Daniel Boorstin,The Genius of American Politics,Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1953,pp.68,70.
    (18)Robert E.Brown,Middle-Class Democracy and the Revolution in Massachusetts,1691-1780,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1955.
    (19)Young,"American Historians Confront 'The Transforming Hand of Revolution'," in Hoffman,et al.,eds.,The Transforming Hand of Revolution,p.427.
    (20)Gary B.Nash,Race and Revolution,The Merrill Jensen Lectures in Constitutional Studies,Madison,Wis.:Madison House,1990,p.x.
    (21)See Carl Becker,"Everyman His Own Historian," The American Historical Review,Vol.37,No.2(January 1932),pp.221-236; Charles A.Beard,"Written History as an Act of Faith," The American Historical Review,Vol.39,No.2(January 1934),pp.219-231.(http://links.jstor.org)
    (22)Alfred F.Young,The Shoemaker and the Tea Party:Memory and the American Revolution,Boston:Beacon Press,1999,pp.108-113,186-187.
    (23)T.H.Breen,American Insurgents,American Patriots:The Revolution of the People,New York:Hill and Wang,2010,pp.3,10.
    (24)Young,The Shoemaker and the Tea Party,pp.vii-viii.
    (25)Herbert Aptheker,The American Revolution,1763-1783,New York:International Publishers,1960.
    (26)Thad W.Tate,Review of The American Revolution,1763-1783 by Herbert Aptheker,The William and Mary Quarterly,Third Series,Vol.18,No.3(Jul.,1961),pp.445-446.
    (27)Philip S.Foner,Labor and the American Revolution,Westport,Conn.:Greenwood Press,1976,see especially pp.x,33,35,36-39,108,201-202.
    (28)Pauline Maier,Review of Labor and the American Revolution by Philip S.Foner,The William and Mary Quarterly,Third Series,Vol.35,No.2(Apr.,1978),pp.411-413.
    (29)Bernard Friedman,Review of Artisans for Independence:Philadelphia Mechanics and the American Revolution by Charles S.Olton,The Journal of American History,Vol.63,No.2(Sep.,1976),pp.392-393.
    (30)Eric Hobsbawm,Primitive Rebels:Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movement in the 19th and 20th Centuries,Manchester:University Press,1963; George Rude,The Crowd in the French Revolution,New York:Oxford University Press,1959; George Rude,The Crowd in History:A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and England,1730-1848,New York:John Wiley and Sons,1965.
    (31)有书评作者认为，虽然在莱米什写作其博士论文期间，E.P.汤普森、霍布斯鲍姆和鲁德等人的研究或在进行中，或已成书出版，但他不一定受到了这些人的影响，而很可能是独立地提出了自己的见解。Daniel Vickers,Review of Jack Tar us.John Bull by Jesse Lemisch The William and Mary Quarterly,Third Series,Vol.55,No.3(July,1998),p.462.
    (32)到了70年代，研究群众直接行动的学者大多受到鲁德、霍布斯鲍姆和汤普森等人的影响。See Dirk Hoerder,Crowd Action in Revolutionary Massachusetts,1765-1780,New York:Academic Press,1977,p.3.爱德华·康特里曼在一本书中也承认，他受到了E.P.汤普森·阿尔贝·索布尔、鲁德、克里斯托弗·希尔和霍布斯鲍姆的影响，还从马克思和列宁关于革命的理论中获得了启发。See Edward Countryman,A People in Revolution:The American Revolution and the Political Society in New York,1760-1790,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1981,pp.xiii,xiv.