(114)Young,"American Historians Confront 'The Transforming Hand of Revolution'," in Hoffman,et al.,eds.,The Transforming Hand of Revolution,pp.455-469.
    (115)James T.Paterson,Grand Expectations:The United States,1945-1974,New York:Oxford University Press,1996,pp.442-457.
    (116)Jonathan M.Wiener,"Radical Historians and the Crisis in American History,1959-1980," The Journal of American History,Vol.76,No.2(Sep.,1989),p.399; Peter Norvick,That Noble Dream:The "Objectivity Question" and the American Historical Profession,Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1988,pp.415-438,469-510.另参见[美]彼得·诺维克著，杨豫译：《那高尚的梦想：“客观性问题”与美国历史学界》，三联书店2009年版，第567-598、640-697页。
    (117)Lemisch,"The American Revolution Seen from the Bottom Up," in Bernstein,ed.,Toward a New Past,pp.5,29.
    (118)Jesse Lemisch,Towards a Democratic History:A Radical Education Project Occasional Paper(n.p.,1966),quoted in Wiener,"Radical Historians and the Crisis in American History," p.421.
    (119)Wiener,"Radical Historians and the Crisis in American History," p.421.
    (120)Nash,The Unknown American Revolution,p.xxviii.
    (121)Wiener,"Radical Historians and the Crisis in American History," pp.402-404.
    (122)Young,"American Historians Confront 'The Transforming Hand of Revolution'," in Hoffman,et al.,eds.,The Transforming Hand of Revolution,pp.436-437; Lemisch,Jack Tar vs.John Bull,p.x.
    (123)Wiener,"Radical Historians and the Crisis in American History," pp.427-432.
    (124)参见王希：《何谓美国历史？围绕〈全国历史教学标准〉引起的辩论》，《美国研究》，1998年第4期。
    (125)Francis D.Cogllano,Revolutionary America,1763-1815:A Political History,London and New York:Routledge,2000.
    (126)Michael A.McDonnell,Review of Revolutionary America,1763-1815:A Political Historyby Francis D.Cogllano,The William and Mary Quarterly,Third Series,Vol.58,No.2(Apr.,2001),pp.550-553.
    (127)Mayer,Review of To Be Useful to the World,The William and Mary Quarterly,p.309.
    (128)Young,"American Historians Confront 'The Transforming Hand of Revolution'," in Hoffman,et al.,eds.,The Transforming Hand of Revolution,pp.488-489.
    (129)美国宾夕法尼亚大学教授迈克尔·朱克曼(Michael Zuckerman)2009年11月在北京大学历史学系的演讲专门讨论了这种名为“the new Founders' chic”的现象。有关报道见《美国史研究通讯》2009年第2期。
    (130)Thomas G.West,Vindicating the Founders:Race,Sex,Class,and Justice in the Origins of America,Lanham,Md.:Rowman and Littlefield,1999; Joseph J.Ellis,"Who Owns the Eighteenth Century?" The William and Mary Quarterly,Third Series,Vol.57,No.2(Apr.,2000),pp.417-421.
    (131)Wood,The Idea of America,pp.12,20-21,189-212.
    (132)Nash,The Unknown American Revolution,p.64.
    (133)Nash,The Unknown American Revolution,p.307.
    (134)在纳什看来，印第安人为应对美国革命给他们造成的困境所采取的行动，实际上构成“印第安人的美国革命”。(Nash,The Unknown American Revolution,p.17.)可是，多数印第安人部落当时是自外于英国和美国控制的主权实体，他们对美国革命的态度，类似国际关系中某国对他国革命的反应，并不能算作美国革命的内容。再者，印第安人既没有“革命”的概念，也没有革命的要求；美国革命使他们陷于困境本非他们所愿，他们处在英美冲突的夹缝中间而被迫站队，终受“池鱼之殃”，实在是一件很不幸的事。后世史家如果硬把他们没有意识到、也不想要的东西强加给他们，似乎有非历史的嫌疑。
    (135)Lemisch,Jack Tar vs.John Bull,p.xii.
    (136)Young,Nash,and Raphael,eds.,The Revolutionary Founders,pp.337,376,386.